Introductory

1   Multilingualism vs International Auxiliary Language

2   Two Types of IAL: Auxlang & Onelang

3   The Horns of a Dilemma: A Dialogue

4   Two Kinds of Auxlang: ETMA & JPVP

5   Two Languages or One?

6   What is a Language Hierarchy?

 The "Jargon ~ Pidgin ~ Vernacular" Progression

 How to Promote an IAL

 

                 LangX: A Model IAL Outlined

  LangX: The World Language Dilemma Resolved

10  The Phonetic Basis of a Global Core Vocabulary

11  Towards a Lang25 Phonology

12  Criteria for Core Vocabulary Selection

13 The Unish Wordlist: A Brave Attempt

14  More Wordlists, Please!

15  A "Basic English" Global Core Vocabulary

 

               Some Further Considerations

16  Two Articles by Prof. Bruce M. Beach

17  Three Short Articles about LangX by Jens Wilkinson

18  Proto-World + Creole......by T. Peter Park PhD

19  An Exemplary IAL Grammar by Jeffrey Brown

20  Pre-2002 Articles about LangX

 

 

LangX is a scheme for the progressive synthesis of the best elements of both existing "natural" tongues and new constructed languages into a single world language of incomparable range and richness in the distant future, via a "global pidgin" IAL, according to the jargon -> pidgin -> vernacular model that has produced successful localised common languages in the past.


 

Acknowledgements: My grateful thanks to all those who have provided comments and feed-back about this site, including Prof. Bruce Beach, Jens Wilkinson, Chaba Gryphon and Jeffrey Brown.

The table below is explained on the LangX page, and "seasoned IALers" might like to go there first, without preamble.

Antony Alexander         aita   [at]   langx.org

Lang53

27

26

2726AD

100%

0%

Lang49

26

23

2623AD

98%

2%

Lang45

25

20

2520AD

90%

10%

Lang41

24

17

2417AD

70%

30%

Lang37

23

14

2314AD

30%

70%

Lang33

22

11

2211AD

10%

90%

Lang29

21

08

2108AD

2%

98%

Lang25

20

05

2005AD

0%

100%

The IAL issue is much too important to be determined except by an internationally-representative language committee (ILC) in consultation with all interested parties. The very appointment of such a body would surely result in the formation of a new constructed language rather than the selection of an existing language. Moreover, in view of the extensive work already carried out in this area, the resultant language would inevitably be based upon what has already been proven: in which context LangX - a development of earlier work by Prof. Bickerton and others - is offered up for the ILC's consideration.